Why Eugenics, anti-feminism and nationalism go hand in hand


What is moral is necessary, and what is necessary for the long term national interest must be moral.

Any self-respecting nationalist should be prepared to have a rational and civil discussion on the subject of eugenics. What is nationalism but the promotion of the LONG-TERM national interest? Eugenics are merely policies designed to prevent degeneracy. It is in the long-term national interest to prevent degeneracy.

Is it not necessary in the long term national interest to prevent degeneracy?

If it is necessary, is it not moral?

Feminists hate the idea of eugenics, but feminists are immoral women, are they not?  Immoral women are promiscuous women, and promiscuous women are the cause of widespread illegitimacy.

Widespread illegitimacy is of course the cause of degeneracy.

What is degeneracy?

Being physically, morally and intellectually inferior to your parents.  

Eugenics is necessary and moral in the long-term national interest.

A prosperous farmer is one who practices good husbandry.  A prosperous and strong nation is not afraid to tell the most evil and immoral of its women that they are evil and immoral.  A strong nation is not afraid of questioning its pornocracy and those who serve it.

The men who are nominally in charge, like Cameron and others, are really only the Head Gardener or the butler if not the coachman of the pornocracy.

Who are the pornocracy?  The slut single mums who have the vote.  

They can be defeated.  Indeed, they must be defeated, or the next generation will be even more degenerate and beyond redemption than this one.  


"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

The Bhagavad Gita

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 30 second rapist

Verse in Koran implicitly accepts the existence of brothels

My interpretation of that wife-beating verse 4:34